In international law, the attacks on Mumbai would probably reveal Pakistan to have been the aggressor state, India the victim of aggression. It is standard law that a “master” is responsible for the misdeeds of his “servant”. E.g., “Where the relation of master and servant clearly exists, the employer is responsible for injury occasioned by the negligent conduct of the servant in carrying out his orders. And this rule is so extensive as to make the master liable for the careless, reckless and wanton conduct of his servant, provided it be within the scope of his employment”. President Zardari and Prime Minister Gillani may declare truthfully they had no prior knowledge of the attacks on Mumbai, that these were not in any way authorized by them or their Government. But it seems likely on the basis of current evidence that the young terrorists who attacked Mumbai were still in a “master-servant” relationship with elements of the Pakistani state and had been financed, trained, motivated and supplied by resources arising, directly or indirectly, from the Pakistani exchequer. Public moneys in Pakistan came to be used or misused to pay for aggression against India — in a quite similar pattern to the October 1947 attack on Kashmir, Ayub Khan’s 1965 “Operation Grand Slam”, and Pervez Musharraf’s 1999 attack on Kargil.
And to think that these youth who were made into becoming terroristic mass murderers were toddlers when the USSR withdrew from Afghanistan, in primary school when the 1993 WTC bombing happened and adolescents at the time of the 9/11 attacks.
Independent Indian: Work & Life of Professor Subroto Roy 
November 30, 2008 at 6:13 pm
We in Pakistan are sorry upon Mumbai attacks. But what is the proof of Pakistani involvement? How are India’s agencies so fast when they were not able to stop terrorists entering? India should not blame Pakistan or start a war with us. Pakistan is also a victim of terrorism and has no responsibility to save India. If India wants to start a war then it’s up to them.
November 30, 2008 at 6:30 pm
Well, apropos the previous comment, I understand the evidence available so far has been from the one perpetrator who was captured alive plus the boat, cell phone etc found by the police.