Become a US Supreme Court Justice! (Explorations in the Rule of Law in America)

November 9, 2008 — drsubrotoroy

 

For almost two decades, Since the summer of 1988 when *Philosophy of Economics* got accepted for publication, I have found myself in a saga exploring the Rule of Law, the nature of justice and freedom, and the nature of racial animosity and xenophobia in the United States. Judge it here for yourself. Files 1 and 2 marked SCOTUS are the front-matter and Petition for Writ of Mandamus as received by Circuit Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the Supreme Court of the United States in February 1996. Files 3 to 10 constitute the Appendix of Record giving the rulings of the US District Court for the District of Hawaii and the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, including especially in File 8 the “after-discovered” evidence of how my attorney had been covertly purchased by my opponent. An example of perjured trial testimony is contained in File 2. In September 2007, I asked my opponent — the Government of one of the 50 States — to voluntarily admit its wrongdoings to the present Chief Judge of the US District Court as is required by law. Government lawyers should, after all, try to act lawfully.

file1scotuswritofmandamuspetitionfronmatter

file2scotuspetitionforwritofmandamus

file3recordcoverandcontents

file4judgekayon60b6rehimselfb1tob7

file5ninthcircuitbriefingscheduleb8tob9

file6ninthcircuitunlawfulordersb10tob13

file7nnthcircuitdocketb14

file8evidenceofraudoncourtb15tob20

file9districtcourtdocketb21tob331

file10recordendmatterb34tob39


Advertisement
Posted in Academic economics, Academic freedom, Academic research, American academia, American democracy, American history, American society, anarchy and governance, Attorney fraud, Common Law and Equity, Embracery, Equity, Federal Rule 60(b), Fraud, Fraud on the Court, Freedom, Good and Evil, Hazel Atlas 322 US 238, India's emigrants to the West, International Law, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Law, Lying, Mandamus, Mendacity, Natural Justice, Perjury & Bribery in US Federal Court, Roy vs University of Hawaii, Rule of Law, State of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, US Constitution, US Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit, US District Court District of Hawaii, US Federal Law & Jurisprudence, US Justice Department, US Supreme Court, USA Rule of Law, USA, United States. Leave a Comment »

Become a US Supreme Court Justice! (Explorations in the Rule of Law in America) Preface

November 9, 2008 — drsubrotoroy

For almost two decades, Since the summer of 1988 when *Philosophy of Economics* got accepted for publication, I have found myself in a saga exploring the Rule of Law, the nature of justice and freedom, and the nature of racial animosity and xenophobia in the United States. Judge it here for yourself. There are 10 pdf files in a password protected post of the same name. Please send me an email identifying yourself and offering any reason, including curiosity, that you may have to want to examine the matter.

Files 1 and 2 marked SCOTUS are the front-matter and Petition for Writ of Mandamus as received by Circuit Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the Supreme Court of the United States in February 1996. Files 3 to 10 constitute the Appendix of Record giving the rulings of the US District Court for the District of Hawaii and the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, including especially in File 8 the “after-discovered” evidence of how my attorney had been covertly purchased by my opponent. An example of perjured trial testimony is contained in File 2. In September 2007, I asked my opponent — the Government of one of the 50 States — to voluntarily admit its wrongdoings to the present Chief Judge of the US District Court as is required by law. Government lawyers should, after all, try to act lawfully.

For the files with the evidence please see https://independentindian.com/2008/11/09/become-a-us-supreme-court-justice-explorations-in-the-rule-of-law-in-america/

 

Posted in Academic economics, Academic freedom, Academic research, American academia, American democracy, American history, anarchy and governance, Common Law and Equity, Embracery, Equity, Federal Rule 60(b), Fraud on the Court, Freedom, Hazel Atlas 322 US 238, India's emigrants to the West, Jurisprudence, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Law, Lying, Mandamus, Mendacity, Natural Justice, Perjury & Bribery in US Federal Court, Philosophy of Economics, Racism, Roy vs University of Hawaii, Rule of Law, University of Hawaii, US Constitution, US Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit, US District Court District of Hawaii, US Federal Law & Jurisprudence, US Justice Department, US Supreme Court, USA Rule of Law, USA, United States. Leave a Comment »