Neglecting technological progress was the basis of my pessimism about Chandrayaan

November 9, 2008 — drsubrotoroy

I have been very pessimistic about Chandrayaan-I’s prospects and I am delighted to hear ISRO say it has been successful in placing the spacecraft in lunar orbit.

https://independentindian.com/2006/08/13/indias-moon-mission/

  I have had to wonder where, precisely, my pessimism was mistaken.  The answer is that I had completely left out in my thinking the vast technological progress that has taken place in telecommunications  and telemetry in the last 40 years.  I had surveyed the history of similar attempts by the USSR and USA in the 1960s and that was a history littered by failures of  many sorts.    Let aside rocket-launch failures, the other main sources of failure were in trajectories and in communications.  I have been deeply concerned that India was simply going to fall in the same pitfalls along the way.   But  what I neglected was that our attempt was being made forty years  later and the world has seen enormous technological progress during that time, especially in telecom.  The Soviet and American missions took place in the early 1960s when, for example, colour television hardly existed.  Today, in 2008, ISRO seems to have managed control and guidance systems that have been up to the (very complex) task of placing the spacecraft in lunar orbit.  Hats off to ISRO if it turns out they have succeeded, and cheers if they actually manage to get the scientific data they have wished to receive.

The same mistake that I made here in a  field not my own is what I have myself pointed out being made  in a different context regarding the current world financial crisis.  Viz., I said in my September 18 2008 Business Standard article “October 1929? Not!” that the world since the 1929 stock market crash had witnessed so much technological progress that the current crisis could not be compared to the one back then.

Subroto Roy,

November 9 2008

Posted in Chandrayan, India's Moon mission, India's Space Programme, Space explorations, Technological progress. Leave a Comment »

Become a US Supreme Court Justice! (Explorations in the Rule of Law in America)

November 9, 2008 — drsubrotoroy

 

For almost two decades, Since the summer of 1988 when *Philosophy of Economics* got accepted for publication, I have found myself in a saga exploring the Rule of Law, the nature of justice and freedom, and the nature of racial animosity and xenophobia in the United States. Judge it here for yourself. Files 1 and 2 marked SCOTUS are the front-matter and Petition for Writ of Mandamus as received by Circuit Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the Supreme Court of the United States in February 1996. Files 3 to 10 constitute the Appendix of Record giving the rulings of the US District Court for the District of Hawaii and the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, including especially in File 8 the “after-discovered” evidence of how my attorney had been covertly purchased by my opponent. An example of perjured trial testimony is contained in File 2. In September 2007, I asked my opponent — the Government of one of the 50 States — to voluntarily admit its wrongdoings to the present Chief Judge of the US District Court as is required by law. Government lawyers should, after all, try to act lawfully.

file1scotuswritofmandamuspetitionfronmatter

file2scotuspetitionforwritofmandamus

file3recordcoverandcontents

file4judgekayon60b6rehimselfb1tob7

file5ninthcircuitbriefingscheduleb8tob9

file6ninthcircuitunlawfulordersb10tob13

file7nnthcircuitdocketb14

file8evidenceofraudoncourtb15tob20

file9districtcourtdocketb21tob331

file10recordendmatterb34tob39


Posted in Academic economics, Academic freedom, Academic research, American academia, American democracy, American history, American society, anarchy and governance, Attorney fraud, Common Law and Equity, Embracery, Equity, Federal Rule 60(b), Fraud, Fraud on the Court, Freedom, Good and Evil, Hazel Atlas 322 US 238, India's emigrants to the West, International Law, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Law, Lying, Mandamus, Mendacity, Natural Justice, Perjury & Bribery in US Federal Court, Roy vs University of Hawaii, Rule of Law, State of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, US Constitution, US Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit, US District Court District of Hawaii, US Federal Law & Jurisprudence, US Justice Department, US Supreme Court, USA Rule of Law, USA, United States. Leave a Comment »

Become a US Supreme Court Justice! (Explorations in the Rule of Law in America) Preface

November 9, 2008 — drsubrotoroy

For almost two decades, Since the summer of 1988 when *Philosophy of Economics* got accepted for publication, I have found myself in a saga exploring the Rule of Law, the nature of justice and freedom, and the nature of racial animosity and xenophobia in the United States. Judge it here for yourself. There are 10 pdf files in a password protected post of the same name. Please send me an email identifying yourself and offering any reason, including curiosity, that you may have to want to examine the matter.

Files 1 and 2 marked SCOTUS are the front-matter and Petition for Writ of Mandamus as received by Circuit Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the Supreme Court of the United States in February 1996. Files 3 to 10 constitute the Appendix of Record giving the rulings of the US District Court for the District of Hawaii and the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, including especially in File 8 the “after-discovered” evidence of how my attorney had been covertly purchased by my opponent. An example of perjured trial testimony is contained in File 2. In September 2007, I asked my opponent — the Government of one of the 50 States — to voluntarily admit its wrongdoings to the present Chief Judge of the US District Court as is required by law. Government lawyers should, after all, try to act lawfully.

For the files with the evidence please see https://independentindian.com/2008/11/09/become-a-us-supreme-court-justice-explorations-in-the-rule-of-law-in-america/

 

Posted in Academic economics, Academic freedom, Academic research, American academia, American democracy, American history, anarchy and governance, Common Law and Equity, Embracery, Equity, Federal Rule 60(b), Fraud on the Court, Freedom, Hazel Atlas 322 US 238, India's emigrants to the West, Jurisprudence, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Law, Lying, Mandamus, Mendacity, Natural Justice, Perjury & Bribery in US Federal Court, Philosophy of Economics, Racism, Roy vs University of Hawaii, Rule of Law, University of Hawaii, US Constitution, US Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit, US District Court District of Hawaii, US Federal Law & Jurisprudence, US Justice Department, US Supreme Court, USA Rule of Law, USA, United States. Leave a Comment »