Economist
The search engine above should locate any article by its title; the Index and Archives may be used as well.
Readers are welcome to quote from my work under the normal “fair use” rule, but please try to quote me by name and indicate the place of original publication in case of work being republished here. I am at Twitter @subyroy, see my latest tweets above
March 25, 2008 at 10:35 pm
I am afraid I think India is still a gigantically awful place.
March 26, 2008 at 4:25 am
I think this is a great article. The Chinese state has a history of fear of instability because its history has had patches of such great upheaval (the latest being only 40 years ago). Consequently it has developed a sort of “stability insecurity” and instituted heavy-handed means to prevent the possible dissolution of the state as it is.
March 26, 2008 at 8:23 am
I am Chinese and I have a lot of admiration for India. My Indian friends know that not all Chinese think alike. One of the best things that has happened in the last decade has been the twin takeoff of both India and China. This is a great article and expresses of course not the whole truth, but at least enough for China to ponder its ethnic policies. As far as the most recent events are concerned, it is clearly a riot it seems to me and order has to be restored. However, it should serve as a lead for China to rethink its policies, and I am certainly encouraged as China has had a record of meeting most, if not all, of the demands of the people as shown to be the case after June 4 1989.
March 26, 2008 at 9:30 am
“In India, our soft state and indolent corrupt apparatus of political parties constitute nothing like the organized aggressive war-machine”. By way of democracy, colonial rule did bequeath some benefits. China, being a product of its own history, values stability more — comparatively speaking, far more ethnic violence may be erupting in India than in China.
“The Dalai Lama and other Tibetan exiles also have a natural right to be issued Chinese passports enabling them to return to Tibet”. This seems to me naive –without reaching a political settlement, allowing the Dalai Lama to return would merely create confusion and inflame further ethnic tensions. Moreover, allowing elections in Tibet is presently infeasible:
1. Without a shared national consciousness would risk the recent Keyan scenario.
2. The Tibetan votes would be overwhelmed by the Han votes.
3. Tibetans are united because of a charismatic Dalai Lama. Will the next Dalai Lama be like that? If not, then the purpose of allowing the Dalai Lama to return is risky and potentially useless.
Finally, India is a democracy with multi-party elections, which is a great accomplishment but let’s not take it too far: it’s not like other forms of government can work for India, with its multitudes without a preponderantly dominant ethnicity. The tradeoff is inefficiency in the running of the government. India is a democracy because that is clearly, with British influence, the best arrangement. Similarly, China is more authoritarian given its own experience. There is clearly merit in the Chinese focus on economic development regardless of ideological preference for forms of government. Rebellions occurs when people lack jobs. Look no further than the insurgencies in Nagaland and Manipur in a democratic India.
July 24, 2008 at 1:36 am
I thought this is a great article that appears completely unbiased. I did not read anything negative about the Chinese people, instead it was simply a methodical argument about the two systems (both of which are far from being ideal). It appears to me that China can only be considered a serious power when it learns to maturely accept its shortcomings and work on improving itself. Communist China will perish with the next wave of technological & socio economic revolution coming within the next two decades.
September 6, 2008 at 9:17 am
I think China is doing excellently well. I see it with my own eyes. But human rights and freedom are delayed.
September 7, 2009 at 10:54 am
As a Mongolian from Inner Mongolia myself, I am surprised to read Dr Roy sound as if the Mongols in Inner Mongolia are willing to be assimilated by Chinese. Yes, it is relatively calm in Inner Mongolia and Chinese dominant are more apparent in Inner Mongolia in comparison with Tibet and Singkiag. But please note that Mongols in Inner Mongolia are fighting for their rights and struggling to keep their culture. There is almost daily occurrence of the various forms of protests taking place in Inner Mongolia. I sincerely hope that the world will pay a little more attention to the Mongolia cause in Inner Mongolia.