<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America has yet to play the demographic card: a few million new immigrants would happily buy up all those bad mortgages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://independentindian.com/2009/10/03/america-has-yet-to-play-the-demographic-card-a-few-million-new-immigrants-would-happily-buy-up-all-those-bad-mortgages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://independentindian.com/2009/10/03/america-has-yet-to-play-the-demographic-card-a-few-million-new-immigrants-would-happily-buy-up-all-those-bad-mortgages/</link>
	<description>Work &#38; Life of Dr Subroto Roy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drsubrotoroy</title>
		<link>http://independentindian.com/2009/10/03/america-has-yet-to-play-the-demographic-card-a-few-million-new-immigrants-would-happily-buy-up-all-those-bad-mortgages/#comment-14680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drsubrotoroy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentindian.com/?p=4753#comment-14680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment by
Larry Levine: They wont do that because it is too good of an idea.

Subroto Roy:
Large numbers of doctors and nurses and medical support staff from around the world were attracted with Green Cards in earlier decades; the same could be done here, saying, as it were, here&#039;s a Green Card attached with a bad mortgage (perhaps in a dismal location). A generation of pioneers on a new frontier might arise.
Two birds might be killed with one stone if doctors etc were brought in first, raising the health-care supply curve as well (cartels like the AMA would protest and raise barriers).

Larry Levine:
The Unions wouldn&#039;t let it happen.

Tim Cavanaugh:Thanks for the kind words and the excellent suggestion. Like the MSM-depleted windsock I am, I haven&#039;t been thinking of immigration since the nativists stopped screaming about it. My only problem with your argument is that it&#039;s a utilitarian argument. We shouldn&#039;t be allowing free immigration and emigration to solve our real estate problem. We should be doing it because it&#039;s right, in good times and bad.

Subroto Roy: Real estate is the most real of real sectors; if that is what has gone bad (due to government policy, another very real factor), all other less real, more nominal/monetary assets go bad with it. And the latter (despite window-dressing) will stay bad as long as real estate stays bad. I cannot see how real-estate can improve except with the help of one or two or five million new immigrants]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by<br />
Larry Levine: They wont do that because it is too good of an idea.</p>
<p>Subroto Roy:<br />
Large numbers of doctors and nurses and medical support staff from around the world were attracted with Green Cards in earlier decades; the same could be done here, saying, as it were, here&#8217;s a Green Card attached with a bad mortgage (perhaps in a dismal location). A generation of pioneers on a new frontier might arise.<br />
Two birds might be killed with one stone if doctors etc were brought in first, raising the health-care supply curve as well (cartels like the AMA would protest and raise barriers).</p>
<p>Larry Levine:<br />
The Unions wouldn&#8217;t let it happen.</p>
<p>Tim Cavanaugh:Thanks for the kind words and the excellent suggestion. Like the MSM-depleted windsock I am, I haven&#8217;t been thinking of immigration since the nativists stopped screaming about it. My only problem with your argument is that it&#8217;s a utilitarian argument. We shouldn&#8217;t be allowing free immigration and emigration to solve our real estate problem. We should be doing it because it&#8217;s right, in good times and bad.</p>
<p>Subroto Roy: Real estate is the most real of real sectors; if that is what has gone bad (due to government policy, another very real factor), all other less real, more nominal/monetary assets go bad with it. And the latter (despite window-dressing) will stay bad as long as real estate stays bad. I cannot see how real-estate can improve except with the help of one or two or five million new immigrants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

